So basically, literature can be super abstract and annoying as it pleases, but we are probably going to be expected to figure out its meaning anyway. This honestly leads me to the question of "what if it really dosnt mean anything?" I understand that authors are usually writing from a place of personal experience or emotion, so their work typically has more weight than just words; however, what if they are just writing to write? Words are such a beautiful thing, aside from their meaning. What if an author or poet decides to write a piece about bunk beds because he or she likes the way the word(s) sounds or looks on paper. Then as the good and insightful readers we are, we decode that the bunk beds represent duality and how one can not be separated from the other and so on....when in reality, the writer just wanted something that began with the letter -b.
Now don't get me wrong, I also understand that many abstract ideas in works of literature do hold immense meaning and weight. I actually think that these kinds of out-there symbols keep literature alive and evolving. It introduces new ideas and trains of thought that may or may not catch on and become a more widely accepted and known archetype. I however, think that the most beautiful part of a random topic in a work of literature is simply its uniqueness. It gives us an open window into the author's mind in a way that would probably not be possible if they were to have stuck to the status quo and wrote a love story or a hero's journey. Their creativity keeps their work innovative and although it may be difficult for us as readers to decipher the meaning of such work, it keeps us on our toes and expecting the unexpected. It greatly strengthens our imagination and ability to understand others true intentions when we stop and take the time to try and figure out what the bunk beds, or flea, or red wagon truly meant to the writer. It also reminds us that reading literature is a journey unique to every piece you choose to read and writer you discover.
In the end, although it can be difficult and annoying to be caught off guard by literature, it is ultimately only for good. However, I truly believe we must be careful to not overanalyze literature in an attempt to place specific meaning on everything. Not everything is meant to be understood, but that's just the beauty of it. If everything was meant to be analyzed, there would not be much room for discovery. On the other hand, it is okay to really try your hardest to figure out what that flea really meant to Donne in his work, The Flea. It gives us a little peek into their world, who they truly are as writers.
Here's even more! http://flavorwire.com/477906/50-of-the-greatest-characters-in-literature
(this touches on some off beat charactures in literature...possibly another way to grasp deeper understanding of our authors is to look into interesting characters they create)


